07 March 2007

Nooma & Velvet Elvis

Am still feeling captivated by the NOOMA videos (or more precisely, #1 "Rain") and am trying to weigh up the whole "doing evangelism in a faithful yet relevant way".
As part of that weighing, I decided to have a look at Biblical critiques of Rob Bell's first book, "Velvet Elvis". The best I read was at Reformation 21. From the excerpts they quote, I have to say I agree with their conclusions: Rob Bell is clearly well-intentioned and seems well-taught. He's a great communicator and he says things in fresh ways. And so you really want to agree with him. But there are some serious errors in that book.
Pivotally, he seems to tie truth to experience rather than knowledge. And that seems to work itself (unsurprisingly) in tying our relationship with God to our experience of Him, rather than His revelation of himself to us in and through the Bible. For example,

Bell speaks of a time in his life when he was getting burned out trying to be a “super-pastor.” He reveals the advice of his counselor that helped him come to grips with the essence of his sin.

“He said, in what has become a pivotal moment in my journey, ‘Your job is the relentless pursuit of who God has made you to be. Anything else you do is sin and you need to repent of it’.” Velvet Elvis, 114

Once again this sounds appealing and may have good motives. Bell hopes to help people rid themselves of an idealized version of what they are supposed to be, accept who they are, and realize that this is an important part of accepting God’s grace.

Yet, the Bible speaks of sin and grace in so much more profound and accurate terms. Where does the Bible ever suggest that our primary calling is “the relentless pursuit of who God has made us to be”? Bell makes it sound as if the essence of godliness is self-realization. His “sin” was that he was trying to be a “super-pastor,” something that went contrary to his personal make-up. Apparently, he was too creative and spontaneous to fit that mould. His “repentance” was a matter of deciding to “kill super-pastor” and be true to himself.

Now I do believe that experience is a key part of God's work in us. But it seems to me that the flow must always be:
Bible ---> Head ---> Heart
and not the other way around. As a very good friend once said to me, once you lose the Bible as decisive authority, you cut the anchor chain. The ship might drift quickly, or it might drift slowly, but it will drift. Now from what I've seen, I think it's unlikely that Bell himself will drift far. But those who are brought up on his teaching or intentionally imitate him may well do.

So back to the NOOMA videos. Should we (as this month's issue of the Briefing suggests) never use them for anything other than critique? Well, I'm still not convinced on that front. Rain seems to me to be a great video to share with friends who've been going through hard times. It seems to say a lot of the things I would want to say, but often don't have the opportunity or the courage or the words. In many ways, it is echoing Jesus' call, "come to me all you who are weary and are heavy laden and you will find rest for your souls." Now I would really struggle to get many of these friends into church, or to read a Christian book on the subject. But it is so easy to watch a 10 minute video that's freely available on the internet. Yes it is true that if they liked it so much that they went and read all of Rob Bell's stuff they might put their trust in Jesus in a way that is less well anchored than you might want. But at least they'd have put their trust in Jesus! And the far more likely scenario is that it will make their minds start turning and asking questions.
Watch it for yourself and let me know what you think!

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Murray,

Hope you are well!

With regard to the video, and basing this on the video alone, it would prove a good starting point and these efforts that are often particularly relevant can often soften peoples hearts to the gospel, and in this regard I think we have to be careful with your diagram (Bible --> Head --> Heart) because although it portrays the 1) The preferred series of events once someone is open to the bible and 2) the preferred order of Authority in a Christians life (although I would add God before bible as the bible itself is just a series of pages, but it is the fact its God's word to us that is essential) it isn't relevant earlier(than before someone is open to the bible), and both videos, such as rain, and exhortations from the Bible on the street, or similar, provide the first step of making people aware of 1) The possibility of God 2) He interacts with his people 3) We need Him more than anything else.
From this point it is then important that people put their faith is Jesus through the Bible and are firmly rooted in it, but the ways of people reaching that point are many and varied, from the above, to more general ways such as friendships with non-Christians and working with non Christians etc., all which can lead to personal conversations and to the bible, and ultimately Jesus. Discussing which ways are 'the best' in terms of bringing people to a place they can investigate the Christian faith can be destructive because as long as we are open, honest and faithfully convey God's love for his people and the sacrifices He has made for us then if the outcome is good fruit in terms of even one person putting their trust in the Lord then we shouldn't criticise or complain, about what should be a joyous time as someone is eternally saved.

Hope this is of some help,

Kenny

9:30 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Apologies for that being hard to read, it had formatting in Word!

Kenny

9:32 pm  
Blogger Explorer said...

Hi there Kenny,

Thanks very much for taking the time to comment :-)
I'm never entirely sure to what extent you're agreeing or disagreeing with me ;-) But here's my attempt at responding to the (helpful) points you made.

* I think the "Rain" video itself does an excellent job of faithfully teaching what the Bible has to say on God's compassion for his creatures in our suffering - so I think we're in agreement there.

* With regard to the diagram (Bible --> Head --> Heart), I appreciate that it is in many ways oversimplified. I mentioned it mainly not in the context of evangelism but rather the context of how people are saved.

"So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ. (Romans 10.17)"

So I think Paul is saying not that it's preferable for people to come to faith through God's word in the Bible, but that it's only possible for people to come to faith in that way.

* However (and this point is just to clarify the above), it is not that the words on the page of the Bible are in some way magical, but it is rather when the meaning of the words are understood and believed in the mind and treasured in the heart that someone can come to faith (because they have come to know and love the person of Jesus as revealed in the Bible).

* One implication of the above is that it is possible for one person to communicate Bible truth to another without one (or either!) being explicitly aware that this is what is happening. However, since they will need to know Christ more and more deeply through his Word in order to grow in faith and to remain faithful in the midst of hardship (see Matthew 13.20-23), then we are clearly far more likely to persevere if we aware of our need to feed on Christ's Word.

* "Discussing which ways are 'the best' in terms of bringing people to a place they can investigate the Christian faith can be destructive..."
I agree that it really doesn't matter how someone turns to Christ as long as they turn to Christ. But I think what I'm trying to do is probe how we can most effectively (from a human perspective) call people to Him. Many would say we need to spend more time emphasising that people have broken God's moral law and that they deserve his condemnation. Other people would say that is completely the wrong way to go about things in this culture. I have some sympathy for both positions, but I assume that they can't be simultaneously right! And I also assume that some means are more effective than others in a particular culture. And to be perfectly honest, I'm really not sure who is right beyond the principles that I laid out in my previous post ("faithful evangelism"). And I'm really interested to know what other people think - so thanks again for your comments :-)

Take care,
Murray

10:34 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home